GABRIEL CLARK AND THE CASE OF THE MISSING CONDOM

Gabriel Clark fucked the cum out of Leo this weekend on Cockyboys, but a funny thing happened on the way to the photoshoot — the condom disappeared. We all know that Gabriel Clark survives on a near-constant diet of freshly harvested young guy semen, but I had to wonder — had Gabriel Clark gone bareback?

Gabriel Clark Goes Bareback?

Gabriel Clark Goes Bareback?

There are no condoms visible in any of the pictures, and Clark was grinning from ear-to-ear. Then I watched the scene, which very definitely DOES feature a condom. Is Cockyboys is trying to have their load and eat it too? They either Photoshopped out the condom, or the photo shoot before the shoot was a lot more uninhibited than the actual footage? What do you think? Did things actually get raw on the set, or is Cockyboys trying to sell the steak with some uncut sizzle?

TRAILER: Gabriel Clark and Leo (via Cockyboys)

Mike

Share
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Responses to “GABRIEL CLARK AND THE CASE OF THE MISSING CONDOM”

  1. Kevin says:

    Dunno why they just don’t feature some bareback scenes like SC and CF..we all know the majority of these porn actors bareback in there every day lives ..besides i think most sites with lagging sales will go that route as this is all about revenue…and thet see there competition running away with mega profits!

  2. T-Bird says:

    That Gabriel is one sexy cocky boy!

  3. EdWoody says:

    How many more sites am I going to have to quit looking at over this issue? Am I really the only person left in the world who actually cares about this stuff? Is there anybody left who uses condoms because they think it’s the right thing to do, are do they all just do it because they think people will talk shit about them if they don’t are just waiting until nobody’s looking to ditch them? Seriously, am I the only one who cares?

    • James says:

      I care that models wear condoms. I won’t watch a porn if its bareback.

    • alex says:

      You are not the only person that cares about condom use in porn. I run a free “tube” site that does not contain any bareback material (except vintage pre-condom scenes). Right now, I have 28,000 clips from 316 different gay adult sites. Although I’m certain I’d make more money if I promoted bareback sites, that’s not something I am willing to do.

  4. Whenever I shot for [2] magazine it was a similar situation. The two guys I would shoot usually had a scene together that was done the day before or the following day, and I would shoot a layout of the models together where all the sex was simulated, and they never had condoms on. I could never get a straight answer as to why they didn’t want to portray condom usage, when in the actual scene they used them, but since there was no actual penetration happening in [2] I guess it didn’t matter to them.

  5. trex says:

    How do “we all know” that most porn stars bareback in their every day lives? Just because you act in porn doesn’t mean you are stupid.

  6. [...] this link: GABRIEL CLARK AND THE CASE OF THE MISSING CONDOM Be Sociable, Share! Tweet actual, clark, cockyboys, condom, ear, gabriel clark, leave, [...]

  7. dmitry says:

    In the pics it looks like just the head is in or they made an illusion of the dick being in by using clever positions or camera angles.

  8. Frankie says:

    This is not rocket-science, they do take pics without condom, maybe he just put the tip because the dick it’s not all the way in. When they actually film it, they do use the condom, that’s all.

Leave a Reply

You must be registered or logged in to post a comment.


 




Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Free WordPress Themes | Thanks to WordPress news theme, WordPress magazine theme and Premium WordPress Themes